Huwebes, Hunyo 1, 2023

[King & Weiss] Disagreement over Mazzulla’s approach showed in a film session during the second round that dove into the offense, when Jaylen Brown broke a huddle by saying, “One, two, three, defense,” according to several sources in the room.

After the All-Star Game, one Celtics source believed some of the team’s best players “just lost focus.” While going 7-6 coming out of the break, Tatum, Marcus Smart and Horford all had negative net ratings, meaning the team was outscored when each of them were on the court. The Celtics’ defense was ripped apart with the starters in the lineup, a revealing development for a team so capable of shutting down opponents.

Some of the players started to believe Mazzulla prioritized the offense too much, according to team sources. Several veterans wondered why the coaching staff went away from Grant Williams, who had a significant role in slowing down Kevin Durant, Giannis Antetokounmpo and Bam Adebayo on the way to the Finals last season. Still, in early March, he received his first DNP-CD since the 2020-21 season. Williams’ playing time was sporadic from that point forward and he again fell out of the rotation when the playoffs began.

The coaching staff believed in Hauser’s offensive production and felt that because opponents were going out of their way to target him and abandon their own offense, his ability to hold up decently in isolation made him impactful. Mazzulla also wanted to get Hauser more experience to prepare him for the playoffs, believing Williams would be ready to go if his number was called. But the team’s veterans believed Williams would be crucial in the playoffs, so Tatum and Brown met with Mazzulla in early March to implore him to put Williams back into the rotation, team sources told The Athletic.

"The stars stepped up and told Joe what they wanted and Joe listened,” a player source said.

After dropping Game 5 of a second-round series against Philadelphia, the Celtics went back to their old starting lineup with Horford next to Robert Williams. The other starters lit up like they had seen an old friend for the first time in decades. Smart said the lineup change made him “ecstatic.”

“That just goes to show you Joe’s learning just like all of us,” Smart said at the time.

That was a sign of the tension inside the Celtics locker room over Mazzulla leaning toward offense. The players understood they had shown defensive slippage earlier in the playoffs and throughout parts of the regular season. Even while beating the Hawks in six games during the first round, they had been gashed periodically by Trae Young. The Celtics nearly bowed out in the second round because James Harden torched them for 40-plus points twice over the first five games of that series, including a Game 1 Sixers win in Boston without MVP center Joel Embiid.

Returning Williams to the starting lineup in Game 6 flipped that series in Boston’s direction. With the old frontcourt duo reunited again, the Celtics held the 76ers to an average of 87 points over the final two games of the series.

For certain players, at least, that was more evidence that the emphasis should have been on defensive dominance all along. After all of the offensive shortcomings during last season’s playoff run, Mazzulla saw the Celtics puzzle differently. He wanted the players to reach a new level as problem solvers. He envisioned a more free-flowing transition game where offense and defense go hand-in-hand and trusted that the team had the talent to play more improvisationally on both ends than it had before.

He wanted them to learn how to diagnose any defensive coverage and come up with solutions on the fly. In early March, after Boston gave up a 24-point lead at home to Brooklyn, Mazzulla called the 3-point attempt rate the most important statistic in basketball. The Celtics played like it. They led the league in 3-point attempts per 100 possessions while ranking second in made 3-pointers per 100 possessions. The problem? When they missed outside shots, they didn’t always have another way to win. They went 31-1 when shooting at least 40 percent on 3-point attempts during the regular season, but fell to 26-24 when falling shy of that number.

Disagreement over Mazzulla’s approach showed in a film session during the second round that dove into the offense, when Brown broke a huddle by saying, “One, two, three, defense,” according to several sources in the room. Multiple players told The Athletic that while Mazzulla had shifted the team’s identity to be more balanced down the middle between offense and defense, they felt that defense wins championships and that last season proved that should be the priority. Players noted they sometimes would come out of the timeouts uncertain about defensive coverages and Blake Griffin, Smart, and Grant Williams, among others, would help the team work things out heading to the court before play resumed.

The strain intensified as the Celtics dropped the first three games against Miami. After giving up a double-digit deficit in the fourth quarter of Game 2, the players had a heated discussion about what they needed to fix, according to team sources. Amid the shouting, Brogdon lit into his teammates, urging them to trust each other like they had all season. The players then sounded shocked after they lost Game 3 128-102.

“I think we have such a high-powered offense with two great superstars and we have such great role guys that no other team really has with so many of them,” Brogdon told The Athletic after losing Game 7. “I think we tended to focus on offense more than anything and making shots and relying on making shots rather than playing defense. And I thought we thought we could make enough shots at the end of the day that defense didn’t have to carry us like it did carry them last year.”

The day after Game 3, Brogdon said the team’s identity had “waned all year long” and he believed the Celtics were still “trying to figure out who we are.” After players spent so much of the season saying they had to not get bored with the little things, it was apparent how much they relied on their shots going down.

“A lot of times our defense has been our kryptonite when we’re not making shots,” Smart said after the season ended.

Following Game 7, Brogdon said teams don’t win championships with a better offense than defense. Tatum and Smart both emphasized that everything for them starts with defense.

Link: https://theathletic.com/4569899/2023/06/01/boston-celtics-joe-mazzulla-wyc-grousbeck-season-recap/



[King] Brad Stevens said the Celtics will look to add someone with substantial NBA experience to Joe Mazzulla’s staff.

https://twitter.com/byjayking/status/1664304115625631745?s=46

[Highlight] Carl Nassib's strip sack in OT sets up the game winning TD.

https://ift.tt/cQRq6Kf

[PFT] Mac Jones: JuJu Smith-Schuster is a football nerd, kind of like me.

https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/status/1664277123836809216

[Gutierrez] #Raiders coach Josh McDaniels, when asked about 'anxiety' fans may have on availability of QB Jimmy Garoppolo come training camp: "I have no anxiety. You guys may have anxiety. I have no anxiety."

https://twitter.com/pgutierrezespn/status/1664309420799700992?s=46&t=q-9tnUc5852JGOololgnkw

The Finals start tonight! Official series prediction thread.

It's time for official predictions--your reputation is on the line!

Here are mine:

Series: Nuggets in 7 games, final game score 108-103

MVP: Jokic, duh

Random predictions: Heat win 2 games with buzzer beaters, Mike Malone gets ejected in game 3.



r/NFL Top 100 Players of the 2022 Season - HUB POST

Welcome to the Hub Post for the r/NFL Top 100 Players of the 2022 Season!

METHODOLOGY

Several years ago we made a decision to focus on ranking just the previous season based on feedback. This year we continued that plan and only ranked players based on their performance during the 2022 regular season, since that is an equal baseline for all players. Post Season play was not considered in the rankings which is a continuation from last year per sub feedback. Additionally, we have increased the games played requirement from 10 games to 11, to be closer in proportion to the prior standard of 10 games in a 16 game season.

  • Step 1: Getting the list of representatives. That’s what we did back in January. We started with over 100 rankers which led to 54 completed ranking submissions

  • Step 2: We began nominating players who ranker’s believe should be considered that have played/ a minimum of 11 regular season games. Rankers from each of the represented fan bases submitted nominations for their own teams' players. This ended up being 194 players in total. This took about a week or so and was the only player pool for consideration.

  • Step 3: The Grind. Once the pool was created, we utilized rankings threads about what tiers each player is in within their position group. Users were to break players into the following tiers for their peers to evaluate: Top 25, Top 50, Top 100, Top 101-125. This is done to give everyone an idea of where each ranker feels a player should be ranked based on 2022 regular season play only. This is an important distinction; if we were to rank players using past performance while projecting their standing heading into the 2023 season, the context would be completely different. Do you think a player who had a down year in 2022 will bounce back to the top tier player he’s been? I’d probably agree. However, that’s not what users were tasked with evaluating. Furthermore, we did this by positional grouping in individual threads; standard positional breakdown was QB, RB, WR, TE, OT, OG, OC, Interior Defensive Linemen (IDL), EDGE Rushers (EDGE), Off-Ball Linebackers (LB), Safety, CB. If most users have a player in Tier III (Top 100), for example, while someone has him unranked while another has him in Tier I, we’ll be able to find out why they are such outliers publicly. This took roughly 2 months, because we want everyone to have a thorough discussion of any questions they may have. It also helps individual rankers visualize where players should land on their own personal lists prior to submitting. It also helps prevent any funny business.

NOTE 1: There were no individual player threads submitted by users discussing the merits of players for or against their placement on the list. Users were also required to complete roughly 80% of these tiers prior to submitting their own lists for the overall average. There were breaks built into the process to allow everyone time to do the work and catch up (if necessary) but inactive users were removed periodically. Hence the difference in the total number of people from the start of the process and the total number of submitted sheets.

NOTE 2: No ranker was forced or encouraged to rank a certain number/limited number of positions on their list based on some arbitrary formula or idea. For example, NO ONE was told they need to limit the number of QBs on their Top 100 list. No ranker was directed to ignore any positional value; users were encouraged to factor positional value as they saw it into their rankings since it is a largely subjective measure.

  • Step 4: After discussions were completed, the remaining users submitted their own, personal Top 125 list. Ranking 125 players was done to get a more accurate and fair average, especially towards the bottom end of the list where rankings tend to wildly fluctuate. Users were given over a week to complete their list.

NOTE 1: Rankings are submitted via individual Google Sheets and auto-compiled into a master list. We reviewed each list for outliers with the help of former rankers to catch individual ranks that are far off the players calculated mean, whether intentionally or accidentally. We calculated a mean rank then the standard deviation for each player. After that, we automatically flagged all ranks outside 1 standard deviation to ensure I caught user submission errors using built-in Google Sheets conditional formatting functions. We also flagged ranks 2 standard deviations or more from the mean to ensure rankers intent with their own list. This was done to ensure flags were identified with as little bias as possible. Conditional Formatting formulas were used to highlight cells to verify automatically to remove subjectivity. Users then had the opportunity to correct any submission errors found prior to finishing the list. We used 1 standard deviation in addition* to 2 since some players had large standard deviations and I wanted to be certain I caught actual mistakes. Rankers were only required to justify ranks 2 standard deviations from the players mean; the keyword here being justify as they weren’t directed to correct them. The entire spirit of this list is to take several individual rankings and find an average.

NOTE 2: All rankings will be made public. That may obviously bring some unwanted heat. But we don’t believe in skirting transparency for convenience sake. This was made known in the Call for Rankers and during the ranking process. This sub will only see the ranks for each post during the reveal. The final post - The Post Mortem - after all reveals will have a data dump with all ranks, individual sheets, and outlier ranking data made available.

  • Step 5: With all rankings submitted and corrections made, if any, users lists were locked and their submissions finalized as their own. We then calculated an average rank as noted above. Unranked players were designated with a rank of 140 to tabulate the average for all nominated players. Additionally, one high rank and one low rank were removed from each player's tally to calculate the average rank. Players ranked 101-125 in the average will make the Honorable Mentions list while the remaining 1-100 will be the ranked players. Any ties were broken by their average before the one high rank and one low rank were removed.

  • Step 6: The Reveal… where we are now!

For the second straight season, myself and u/mattkud have been honored to run the ranking process. We cannot thank our predecessors, u/MikeTysonChicken , /u/Mister_Jay_Peg , u/Staple_Overlord , and u/skepticismissurvival , enough for building a platform that allows us to run this list as thoroughly and efficiently as we did. I’d also like to thank all the rankers, both the ones that finished the list and even those that didn’t. Overall they did a great job (except for the ones that mixed up Quincy Williams and Quinnen Williams on their ranking sheet)

After three years of ranking myself, I can tell you this is a fun way of spending the offseason regardless of the praise or scorn you get for the list. You get to interact with people and fanbases that you might not otherwise pay attention to, and analyze and watch players who you might know only in passing. Sometimes I say the final ranking isn’t the most important part, it’s about the journey of rewatching all these great players and having a newfound appreciation for them. I know I’ve become a more knowledgeable football fan since I first signed up to join the list, and I’m sure most rankers would say the same.

The rankers had a number of strategies for how they ranked the players and each was allowed to follow their own personal guidelines within the given parameters and as long as they were not simply using derivatives of other outside rankings. Basically, have your own positions and beliefs. As the reveal progresses, the rankers will have the ability to volunteer their player lists for the revealed numbers and/or where they ranked the listed players as they wish and you are free to engage with them.

Lastly, players will be revealed on the teams they played/finished the 2022 season with.

RANKING RELEASE SCHEDULE

The Honorable Mentions (125-101) will be released Tuesday. June 6th. The reveal will begin on Thursday, June 8th with spots 100-91. From there we will release a list every Tuesday and Thursday. The Post Mortem will follow the week after all reveal threads.

If you want to follow along with the schedule here it is:

Date Post Link Date Post Link
June 1 Hub Post THIS POST!
June 6 Honorable Mentions link June 8 100-91 link
June 13 90-81 link June 15 90-71 link
June 20 70-61 link June 22 60-51 link
June 27 50-41 link June 29 40-31 link
July 4 30-21 link July 6 20-11 link
July 11 10-6 link July 13 5-1 link
July 18 Post Mortem link

With all of this out of the way, I’m ready for some agreement and/or disagreeing, probably a dash of rage, with the rankings. Hopefully civil but heated discussions on why [insert player here] should/should not be ranked above/below [insert a different player] shall emerge and how it is an absolute travesty/surprise that [insert a totally different player here] is/isn’t included.

See ya Tuesday for the honorable mentions!

packmanwiscy & mattkud