Weighted Results

I'm trying something new by showing the results and graphs first, then explaining the methodologies.

Weighted results focus on high placements (Top 40) to align a bit more closely with the players' Top 20 ballots.

Unweighted Results

Unweighted results account for all lower rankings as well.

Methodologies

I finished charting players and their ranks using this post by u/gds519 as an amazingly helpful starting point.
The final scores were derived from the average Z-scores across the categories covered further below.

The spreadsheet used for tracking and scoring.

Categories Explained

Points

I continued the u/gds519 system by awarding the rank #1 player 100 points, #2 99 points, #3 98 points... and so on, while not ranking awarded no points, then summing the totals across the lists. I converted the point totals to Z-scores to better relate them to the group mean and standard deviation when implementing them into the final results.

Peak

This covers each player's highest achieved ranking. I used a similar method to invert each player's peak ranking, then found the Z-scores for the players' peaks relative to the group average.

Average (Bonus)

For the few players that effectively never dipped out of The Top 100 while eligible (and appeared 3+ years), I found their average ranking. I then found related Z-scores and added a constant so that it would still be a bonus for the lower part of this special group (and not a malus).

T1, T2, T3, T5...

"Times Top 1", "Times Top 2", "Times Top 3", "Times Top 5" and so on in the shown increments. I then found the Z-score to see how impressive the count was relative to the group mean.

Weighted vs Unweighted

Weighted

The "weighted" version excluded the T50, T60, T70, T80, T90, and T100 categories from the final scoring. Players only received credit for T40 ranks and higher. Since ballots only include 20 slots, this seemed like an interesting way to massage away all outlier votes.

Unweighted

The unweighted version averages the Z-scores from all categories. There were more similarities than differences between the versions, but the differences were nevertheless interesting.